(back to list)

Modern Education as Foundation of Buddhist Modernity

W.Waldron  Middlebury College, USA.

ABSTRACT

Modern Education provides children with an understanding of how the world works that reinforces more than it challenges traditional Buddhist worldviews and hence is indispensable for enabling Buddhists to fully engage with the modern world. It does this in several ways.

First, the sciences demonstrate the universality of cause and effect in the natural world. This is not only largely commensurate with Buddhist notions of interdependent causality but also entails that things lack any unchanging essence. That interdependence entails essencelessness is implicit in all the sciences and modern Buddhists can and should make this explicit.

Second, the social sciences emphasize the constructed nature of personal and group identity and illuminate the personal and social conflicts that arise from attempts to secure such identities. This is commensurate not only with Buddhist notions of personal selflessness but also with the deleterious consequences of self-grasping. That the construction of identity leads to suffering and conflict is implicit in all the social sciences and Buddhists can and should make this insight foundational.

Third, many people perceive an unbridgeable gulf between the humanities and the sciences. While the sciences fruitfully analyze the material world in terms of impersonal causal regularities, when they apply this kind of analysis to human experience, it seems to strip us of our sense of agency, identity and purpose. This has provoked reactions against both science and rationality. Buddhist thought, however, has strongly developed a ‘science of mind’ that successfully integrates causal analyses with human experience. This, too, can and should be one of the essential lessons of modern Buddhist education.

Conclusion: throughout the history of Buddhism, Buddhist thinkers have engaged in vigorous debate with the religious, intellectual and scientific worlds around them. They have both been enriched by and have deeply enriched these other traditions and in the process become important, even central, parts of the cultures of India, Nepal, Tibet, Thailand, Burma, Vietnam, China, Japan, etc. But this has happened only because they have deeply engaged their surrounding cultures, bringing Buddhist insights, analyses and sensibilities with them. This is no time to stop. More than ever, Buddhist cultures needs to engage the modern world, in all its pain and glory, with all its achievements and shadows. Not only do Buddhists need modernity, but the modern world needs Buddhism. Education, in the broadest sense of the word, is the vehicle for that.

 

CURRICULUM VITAE

William S. Waldron
Dept. of Religion, Middlebury, Vt. 05753
O: (802) 443-2040; H: (802) 897-5109

EDUCATION

University of Wisconsin-Madison. Ph.D. Buddhist Studies. 1990
Diss.: The Ālaya-vijñāna in the Context of Indian Buddhist Thought.
Otani University, Kyoto, Japan. Research Fellow. 1986-89
Taiwan National Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan. 1982-83
Benares Sanskrit University, Benares, India. Junior Year in India. U-W. 1980-81
University of Wisconsin-Madison. B.A. South Asian Studies. 1982

TEACHING EXPERIENCE

Kathmandu and Tribhuvan Universities. Nepal. Fulbright Scholar. 2007-08
Middlebury College, Middlebury, VT. Assoc. Prof. Asian Religion. 1996-Present
Antioch Buddhist Studies Program, Bodh Gaya, India. Instructor. 1990-1
Osaka National University, Osaka, Japan. Instructor. Classical Tibetan. 1988-89

SELECTED PUBLICATIONS

‘On Selves and Selfless Discourse,’ Between Cultures: Buddhism and Psychotherapy in the Twenty-First Century. 2006c. Wisdom Publications. Pp. 87-104.

‘The Co-arising of Self and Object, World, and Society: Buddhist and Scientific ApprRoaches,’ Buddhist Thought and Applied Psycho. Research. 2006b. RoutledgeCurzon. Pp. 175-208

‘A Comparison of Ālaya-vijñāna in Yogācāra and Dzogchen, co-authored with David F. Germano, in ibid. 2006a. RoutledgeCurzon. Pp. 36-68.

Nagao Gadjin’s Shodaijoron [Mahāyāna-samgraha], Chapter 1 (pp. 58-271) translated from Japanese. Kawamura, L. editor. Anticipated pub. 2009, Wisdom Books.

The Buddhist Unconscious: The Ālaya-vijñāna in the Context of Indian Buddhist Thought . Routledge Curzon. 2003a .

“Common Ground, Common Cause: Buddhism and Science on the Afflictions of Identity,” Buddhism and Science. B. Alan Wallace (ed.), Columbia Univ. Press, 2003b, pp. 145-191.

“Buddhist Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Thinking about ‘Thoughts without a Thinker,’” Eastern Buddhist, 2002, Vol. XXXIV, No. 1, pp. 1-52.

‘How Innovative is the Ālayavijñāna?’ Journal of Indian Philosophy. Part I, 1994. 22: 199-258; Part II, 1995, 23: 9-51.

‘A Comparison of the Ālayavijñāna with Freud’s and Jung’s Theories of the Unconscious.’ Annual Memoirs of Otani Univ. Shin Buddhist Research Institute. 1988 6:109-150.

RECENT SELECTED ACADEMIC PRESENTATIONS

Fifth Annual Symposium on Buddhist Studies, Rangjung Yeshe Institute, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Theme: “Buddhist Education: Tradition & Modernity.” Dec. 9, 2007
Workshop on National Integration and Multiple Identities, Shimla, India. Sept. 14-16, 2007
India Council of Philosophical Research and Indian Institute of Advanced Study.
Consultation on Buddhism & Science, Harvard Divinity School, Cambridge, MA. April, 2007
Conference, Mind and Life Summer Research Institute, Garrison Institute, Garrison, NY, June, 2006
Conference, Symposium on Mind and Reality, Columbia University, NYC. Feb. 24-26, 2006